In keeping with the third part of my mission for this blog,
"3. To share the stories of individual people I've met here who are otherwise unable to get their voices out and onto the Web"
I thought I'd share a story about a man I know in Delhi who has from time to time been my driver.
Dhanesh is a local money lender.
In India he is not poor, though in the U.S. he would probably be considered "blue collar." But Dhanesh has a work ethic and street smarts that would make him a winner in the scrappiest district of Detroit, Boston or the Bronx. Dhanesh knows the gas people. Dhanesh knows the mechanics. Dhanesh knows the prostitutes (or so he told me one day). And Dhanesh knows this microfinance venture capitalist. What Dhanesh doesn't know is that during the day I try to put people like him out of business.
From what I could gather during our conversation, his standard loan product is a 10,000 rupee loan (USD $220) for 100 days, with daily repayment of 120 rupees. That means over the course of 100 days a borrower would pay back a total of 12,000 rupees. A 20% interest rate right? Wrong, try 73%.
The rate being charged is for 100 days. Divide 365 days by 100 and you realize that a loan like this can be turned 3.65 times in a year. Which means 20% multiplied 3.65 times, thus 73%. In addition, this interest is being charged on a "flat" basis (rather than on a declining balance) so at day 99 the borrower is still paying interest on the entire loan amount, even though the vast majority of the principal has been repaid.
If all this math is too much for you to digest on your lunch break, just consider this, the typical MFI (microfinance institution) charges somewhere between 24% and 28% interest per year, meaning Dhanesh is charging more than 2 and a half times what an MFI might charge for the same loan.
When I learned several months into our "driving arrangement" what his primary profession was, I had to ask myself a moral question, "Can I continue to pay this guy?" "Is my cash being used to fund usurious loans to poor people in Delhi?"
In short, the answers were yes, and yes.
In the absence of a better (or cheaper) option, Dhanesh is providing people in his neighborhood with a line of credit that is available 24/7, 365 days a year, with turnaround times for loans of usually under an hour, not a week. He is the ultimate credit officer, with personal knowledge of the credit score and risk appetite of everyone on his turf. He may be charging rates that are ridiculously high to us, but no one else is lending to these people. They are still asking for loans, and, for the most part, paying them back.
What does this tell us about the financial services industry in India at the bottom of the pyramid? At least for me it helped un-demonize "the money lender" in my view of the industry. They are the competition but not the enemy. I don't fault Dhanesh for being a capitalist, but I do hope that by the time I leave India Dhanesh will have been forced to become a full time driver. Loans with implied 70% annual interest rates are indeed usurious, particularly if they are structured so as to make it difficult for the borrower to pay off the principal and reduce his interest payment. More important though, these rates are a sign that Dhanesh's neighborhood needs competition.
So do I keep calling Dhanesh or look for a new driver?
While I've used other taxis, if I want a cabbie who shows up on time, speaks English, knows the city well and can arrange for anything I need (I'm thinking gas connections and groceries here, not prostitutes...) I call Dhanesh. And who is to say the next driver I find won't be involved in some less savory business when he's not behind the wheel.
I will continue to mine Dhanesh for information the next time we talk - where else can I get a good handle on the going rate for a loan in a place where there is no other access to credit? While I'll probably never be able to convince Dhanesh that money-lending at 70% is unethical even if it's profitable, a little microfinance competition may convince Dhanesh that in an efficient market, it is indeed, unsustainable.